Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nucleargeek/Archive

< Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations | Nucleargeek


Nucleargeek

12 January 2015
edit
Suspected sockpuppets

All are new accounts attempting to add POV and copyrighted material and removal of AFD templates from the article Civitatis International - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 16:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User:Drmies has blocked 2 of the users listed here, and requested if anything comes of this investigation to have closing admin place required templates on user pages. As per [1].- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 16:17, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
edit

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
edit
15 March 2015
edit
Suspected sockpuppets

Continual addition of promotion into the Civitatis International article - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 00:54, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
edit

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
edit

  Clerk note: Orbitalwatcher and Reuters52 are CU confirmed as socks of Anti-DefamationLeagueUSA (see: WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Anti-DefamationLeagueUSA). I don't know about Angeleditormonaco. @Mcmatter: Can you provide some more evidence against Angeleditormonaco?

At this point Angeleditormonaco has been indef blocked due to the threats.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:50, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  Clerk note: Putting this case   On hold until WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Anti-DefamationLeagueUSA is resolved, because of the possible connection between those two cases. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:11, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  In progress I'm looking into these three cases, and should have some results in a bit, provided my internet connection doesn't go back to crashing every 10 minutes... ​—DoRD (talk)​ 15:01, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
​—DoRD (talk)​ 15:25, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed socks
Joseph23023
Andy Dingeley
JadeBurrows
Gattacaed
MarshaThompsonUK
Angeleditormonaco
Orbitalwatcher
IsrealADL
Truthseekerbabe
Maryt245
Gchq001
Xy21
Wikiname12
Wikiuser124
Wikipedian2050
AngelbabeNY
MatteoBergamini
Suspected socks
Welikethetruth
Jewishguyisreal
Anonymousallover
Anti-DefamationLeagueUSA
Reuters52
ShoutOutUKisrightwing
Investigator2015
MySmallRedPenl (tagged as suspected to master due to confirmation to Bergaminiweeny, see under)
Bergaminiweeny (both   Blocked and tagged as suspected despite Inconclusive result due to username similarity to confirmed sock MatteoBergamini)
Inconclusive accounts
Timtrentt (already VOA-blocked)
Civitatis International (confirmed to Timtrent1 and blocked for block-evasion of without tags)

☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 19:29, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dammit, I must've missed one... so many goddamn socks. Well, since Mike V didn't rename the case back in January when he blocked the "older" sock, and considering the difference between the two is a matter of hours, and that neither account has edited more than the other (making one a visible "main" account), I don't think it is particularly necessary to move everything under Wikiuser124 at this point; I would be fine with leaving it all under Nucleargeek, unless you can think of a reason not to? ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 22:57, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
19 March 2015
edit
Suspected sockpuppets

Bizarre removal of talk page content at Talk:Civitatis International. [4][5][6][7][8][9]. Bizarre accusations that I and another editor with 9600 edits under her belt are sockpuppets, and other strange behavior: [10][11][12] "Documented threats to person made by user cyphoidbomb documented for police CRN investigation, I.P trace" clearly crosses no legal threats and constitutes harassment. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 12:06, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
edit

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
edit
23 March 2015
edit
Suspected sockpuppets

This is another breaking out of sock puppetry surrounding Shout Out UK. The puppet is already blocked. My purpose for bringing it here is completeness and to ask for a further sleeper check. Someone is obviously obsessed about this entire topic.

It isn't worth notifying the users concerned in view of block status Fiddle Faddle 21:10, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
edit

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Nucleargeek/Archive&oldid=1076211582"